Well I remember when people were talking about distributed computing and they said, "well, this would be trivial if you could just boot unix on all the nodes, haha". So I'm still drawn to the idea of something small, like embedded ROMDOS, on a compute node. But RAM is free and IBM put linux on a wristwatch (honkin' big power suplly, by the standards of wrist watches, but it ran X :-) Peter
On 5/24/07, Larry Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Peter St. John wrote: > This led me to SUNMOS (OS for parallel processing, Sandia's > alternative for the aforementioned intel > PSC descendants) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SUNMOS. Sandia's page > looks like real progress for inertial containment sustainable > thermonuclear fusion, which really wouuld be super duper cool, fuel > your zeppelin with seawater, but I can't find latter-day references to > SUNMOS. Anybody know what became of it I don't know what happened to SUNMOS, but the intellectual descendents of it are the microkernels like L4 and particularly the FASTOS project, see http://www.cs.unm.edu/~fastos/ There's a group who think that full function OSs like Linux are unnecessary or wasteful for clusters. The arguments include virtual memory being unneeded or slow and OS activity ("OS noise") limiting scaling of applications. As a consequence, you see things like BlueGene/L with a microkernel on the compute nodes and Linux on the I/O nodes. I don't necessarily believe the arguments, but I like tinkering with a new tricked out OS as well as the next guy. Just for fun, I tracked down who said "When you hear 'virtual', you should think 'slow'." -- it was Dave Clark of MIT. -Larry
_______________________________________________ Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf@beowulf.org To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf
