The Beaglebone Blue is another Beagle that sports an Octavo OSD3358 Processor.
As far as the BBB Wireless, there is this post on the Octavo site regarding the launch of the BBB Wireless: http://octavosystems.com/2016/09/27/the-beaglebone-black-wireless-and-beagleboard-compatibility/ One notable statement from the link is: "First, the design was greatly simplified by replacing over 150 discrete components with the OSD3358-512M-BAS" Also, the Beaglebone AI uses a Texas Instruments AM5729 which is a bit different. And even more fun, the Beagle-V will use a RISC-V chip. Cheers, Jon On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 5:07 AM Adrian Fülöp <[email protected]> wrote: > > Thank you Robert! > > I forgot to mention that I'm looking at the BBW, but I think your answer > refers to this one as well. > What about the availability between both solutions? My intended > development should be for industry, where they expect very very long > product availability. Would a SIP be better over single components, or does > Octavio face the same problems when any part gets end of life status? > > Is the image really completely the same? No diff config in uboot or > somewhere else? Not easy to compare, because the pinout for both ICs is > different. > > > [email protected] schrieb am Dienstag, 26. Januar 2021 um 13:54:41 > UTC+1: > >> At Mon, 25 Jan 2021 23:15:36 -0800 (PST) [email protected] >> wrote: >> >> > >> > >> > >> > Hello everybody, >> > >> > I'm searching the right hardware for an embedded project. One of the >> Beagle >> > variants is likely to be the right base to start with. Some point I >> > couldn't figure out: >> > >> > Why are some boards using the TI AM335x like BBB and others use the >> same >> > core, but wrapped in a Octavio SIP. I know that it already contains a >> bunch >> > of components board designers place next to the AM335x. But what are >> the >> > main reasons to choose one or the other? Price? Design complexity? Is >> it >> > fully software compatible on image level? >> > >> >> The PocketBeagle uses the Octavio SIP and the Debian images for the BBB >> work >> just fine on the PocketBeagle, with no compatiblity issues. I think the >> Octavio SIP allows for a more compact board because all of the support >> components are incorporated into a single package. This makes for a >> smaller >> (and cheaper) PCB. >> >> -- >> Robert Heller -- Cell: 413-658-7953 <(413)%20658-7953> GV: 978-633-5364 >> <(978)%20633-5364> >> Deepwoods Software -- Custom Software Services >> http://www.deepsoft.com/ -- Linux Administration Services >> [email protected] -- Webhosting Services >> >> -- > For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "BeagleBoard" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beagleboard/9a6e227e-b204-4caf-b263-4614b3997a0en%40googlegroups.com > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beagleboard/9a6e227e-b204-4caf-b263-4614b3997a0en%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > -- For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BeagleBoard" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beagleboard/CAG99bkoa_BszBu5b68NAfjsftmDP2r4NMt%2Bs737g%2B%2BkZPr99tA%40mail.gmail.com.
