Karen Moore <[email protected]> wrote: > *Authors, regarding the change in Section 11.10 (the update of > “Transient Failure” to “Reserved” for value 1), we do see at least one > potential mismatch in the running text. Please review and let us know > if there are any other instances and how we may update for consistency.
I seem to have missed the discussion around this.
> Section 5.1:
> A status of "Transient Failure" (see Section 11.10) is an indication that
the P-DAO-REQ may be retried
> after a reasonable time that depends on the deployment.
If we are keeping this text, then surely the IANA needs to say Transient
Failure for value 1. So, this feels backwards to me.
As far as I know, I've sent all my figure edits and comments.
--
] Never tell me the odds! | ipv6 mesh networks [
] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works | IoT architect [
] [email protected] http://www.sandelman.ca/ | ruby on rails [
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- auth48archive mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
