On 9 July 2014 18:39, Dave Reisner <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm going by the comments. If there's (still) a problem, you haven't > brought it up in the past 4 days since the maintainer updated the > package. Orphaning the package in this case isn't reasonable.
I have, just through e-mail directly to the maintainer. I didn't request it was to be orphaned; someone flagged it as "out of date" because there was no other option to click such as "needs fixing" (which is how this discussion started...) > You clearly do care, otherwise you wouldn't have: > a) tried to hijack the package > b) brought it up here My AUR packages don't support/aren't tested with clang... but if someone commented on one requesting and explaining a simple change so that more people are able to use it, then I would implement it.
