On Wed, 9 Jul 2014 19:00:10 +0100 Steven Honeyman <[email protected]> wrote: > On 9 July 2014 18:39, Dave Reisner <[email protected]> wrote: > > I'm going by the comments. If there's (still) a problem, you haven't > > brought it up in the past 4 days since the maintainer updated the > > package. Orphaning the package in this case isn't reasonable. > > I have, just through e-mail directly to the maintainer. > I didn't request it was to be orphaned; someone flagged it as "out of > date" because there was no other option to click such as "needs > fixing" (which is how this discussion started...)
Yes, I have accepted the request, then realized it's completely untrue and asked the maintainer to re-adopt it. Additionally I'm the one who flagged the package because, obviously, there is a newer release, not because it's broken. Do you really see the point in fixing compilation using clang when literally nothing in PKGBUILD references it? I do not. Please stop wasting time, either people's and yours. -- Bartłomiej Piotrowski http://bpiotrowski.pl/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
