On 9 July 2014 15:08, Evert Vorster <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Naming is important. Here's an idea: lets call them "comments". They can be >>> freeform text so that you can explain why the package needs attention, >>> rather than just pressing some weirdly labeled button and hoping the >>> maintainer figures it out. >> >> +1. A very powerful solution indeed. > > ... Is there not already a comments to the packages in aur?
I'm pretty sure that that's what falconindy meant.
