Le 05/07/2013 23:01, Maxime GAUDUIN a écrit :
On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 10:49 PM, Pedro Alejandro López-Valencia <
[email protected]> wrote:
On vie, 5 de jul 2013 a las 1:34 PM, Maxime GAUDUIN <[email protected]>
wrote:
On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 8:22 PM, SJ_UnderWater <[email protected]>
wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 3:11 PM, Pedro Alejandro López-Valencia <
[email protected]> wrote:
> 2013/7/3 Xorg <[email protected]>
> >
I will disown libkqueue in 2 weeks time provided there is no answer from
niQo, then you can adopt it and we will proceed with the merge.
Cheers,
--
Maxime
Just a precision, the OP is Xorg. The ball is in his field. :-) (I have
no practical use for libkqueue myself, consider me last-resort adopter).
Don't worry, I was replying to SJ_UnderWater :P
Sorry to answer now. Yes, I have made this request, because I think
(like Lukas) libkqueue0 is a duplicate package (from libkqueue, which is
flagged out-of-date).
I use libkqueue only as /darling-git/'s dependency. So I think
SJ_UnderWater's package is the best package for libkqueue. Then, I read
you, and I conclude the best solution is that niQo orphans his package,
SJ_UnderWater adopts it and sends a new request to delete libkqueue0.
About libkqueue-svn, OK, I didn't know svn still exist. SJ_UnderWater,
do you want to adopt it ? I'm not interested by, but I can adopt it in
last-resort.
Thanks.
X0rg.
