On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 8:22 PM, SJ_UnderWater <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 3:11 PM, Pedro Alejandro López-Valencia < > [email protected]> wrote: > > 2013/7/3 Xorg <[email protected]> > > > > > > Hi everybody. > > > > > > > > > Developers don't use svn today (I have downloaded source from svn, we > can see 2010-09-18 v1.0 r344 the latest date in ChangeLog). > > > > > > So, only libkqueue0 appears to be good. > > > I suggest to merge libkqueue and libkqueue-svn into libkqueue0, and > then rename libkqueue0 into libkqueue, for example. > > > > > > > libkqueue is alive and well at http://sourceforge.net/p/libkqueue/ and > > the SVN repository is at http://sourceforge.net/p/libkqueue/code/ The > > latest checkin (r652) was on June 11 this year. You may want to > > contact the maintainer and see if he/she wants to orphan the packages > > for you to update, instead. > > > > > > -- > > http://about.me/palopezv > > > > I see libkqueue-svn has been orphaned, you can adopt and update. About > libkqueue{,0}, did you try contacting the maintainers? It would be better > to have maintainer of libkqueue0 adopt libkqueue and then merge libkqueue0 > into it. I'm CCing both of them. > > > > Cheers, > > > > -- > > Maxime > I once tried to contact niQo about these Apple-sourced packages, but > created my -0 variants to better conform to the standards so they could at > least see what I was talking about; I also respond to flags pretty quickly. > I notice now that stativ has summarily deleted libpthread_workqueue0 for > which I don't have a backup, is this normal? I would have appreciated some > notice. If niQo decides to orphan them, I will accept. > > SJ I will disown libkqueue in 2 weeks time provided there is no answer from niQo, then you can adopt it and we will proceed with the merge. Cheers, -- Maxime
