> On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 3:11 PM, Pedro Alejandro López-Valencia > <[email protected]> wrote: > 2013/7/3 Xorg <[email protected]> > > > > Hi everybody. > > > > > > Developers don't use svn today (I have downloaded source from svn, we can > > see 2010-09-18 v1.0 r344 the latest date in ChangeLog). > > > > So, only libkqueue0 appears to be good. > > I suggest to merge libkqueue and libkqueue-svn into libkqueue0, and then > > rename libkqueue0 into libkqueue, for example. > > > > libkqueue is alive and well at http://sourceforge.net/p/libkqueue/ and > the SVN repository is at http://sourceforge.net/p/libkqueue/code/ The > latest checkin (r652) was on June 11 this year. You may want to > contact the maintainer and see if he/she wants to orphan the packages > for you to update, instead. > > > -- > http://about.me/palopezv > > I see libkqueue-svn has been orphaned, you can adopt and update. About > libkqueue{,0}, did you try contacting the maintainers? It would be better to > have maintainer of libkqueue0 adopt libkqueue and then merge libkqueue0 into > it. I'm CCing both of them. > > Cheers, > > -- > Maxime I once tried to contact niQo about these Apple-sourced packages, but created my -0 variants to better conform to the standards so they could at least see what I was talking about; I also respond to flags pretty quickly. I notice now that stativ has summarily deleted libpthread_workqueue0 for which I don't have a backup, is this normal? I would have appreciated some notice. If niQo decides to orphan them, I will accept.
SJ
