On Mon 14 Mar 2011 05:08 +0100, Heiko Baums wrote: > Am Mon, 14 Mar 2011 11:59:38 +0800 > schrieb Ray Rashif <[email protected]>: > > > On 14 March 2011 10:32, Heiko Baums <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Could the reason be some syntax errors? > > > There are a lot of quotation marks too much. And the settings of > > > your quotation marks seem to be quite inconsistent. > > > > It would be funny if the AUR rejected PKGBUILDs due to syntax "errors" > > or inconsistency [1], especially this one where curly braces and > > double quotes merely dictate whether the build succeeds - not whether > > it is a valid PKGBUILD. > > PKGBUILDs shouldn't be rejected due to syntax errors, but you never > know, anything can happen.
Submitting PKGBUILDs to the AUR isn't exactly a magical happenstance. If you look at the code you will discover that are certain things that happen, and certain things that don't. I realise you're trying to help, but let's please avoid sending people on wild goose hunts. Thanks.
