On Fri, Nov 15, 2019 at 7:38 PM Troy Bowman <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 15, 2019 at 3:56 PM John Kiniston <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> I do not recommend using chan_sip, chan_sip is no longer receiving >> development. >> chan_pjsip is where the development focus is at. > > > Sure, chan_pjsip is where the feature development focus is, but is it truly > stable enough for production now? It seems I still see a lot of bug fixes > for seemingly constant problems, while chan_sip's code is so mature that it > just works hands-off. I'm still afraid of using chan_pjsip in production > just like I am still afraid of Linux's btrfs in production, and btrfs has > been in development for over a decade.
Sangoma/Digium has been using chan_pjsip exclusively in Switchvox for a few years now. Also, chan_sip doesn't really receive bug fixes anymore, so there's that problem as well. With regards to the poster's original question, I'd definitely suggest using chan_pjsip in a new video based environment as that is the channel driver that has been tested and used with all the new video work in Asterisk. -- Matthew Fredrickson Digium - A Sangoma Company | Director of Open Source Software Development 445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA -- _____________________________________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-dev mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
