On Fri, Nov 15, 2019 at 3:56 PM John Kiniston <[email protected]> wrote:
> I do not recommend using chan_sip, chan_sip is no longer receiving > development. > chan_pjsip is where the development focus is at. > Sure, chan_pjsip is where the feature development focus is, but is it truly stable enough for production now? It seems I still see a lot of bug fixes for seemingly constant problems, while chan_sip's code is so mature that it just works hands-off. I'm still afraid of using chan_pjsip in production just like I am still afraid of Linux's btrfs in production, and btrfs has been in development for over a decade.
-- _____________________________________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-dev mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
