Hi,

In 7.1 the default behavior is the same as the setting I suggested:
Next-ID-Commit: F
NextID-Block-Size: 1

In other words it does not matter if you have the above lines in your ar.conf
or you remove them completely.

Have you checked the form-specific setting in forms where you are experiencing
this problem? Is the block size set to 1?

Check your configuration documentation pdf to see which parameters require a
restart of your server.

If you just manually change the config, you might need to run arsignal to make
the config catch.

         Best Regards - Misi, RRR AB, http://rrr.se

> Hi Misi,
>
> My remedy version is 7.1 version.
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 6:36 PM, Misi Mladoniczky <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I presume your version is 7.6.04 or later.
>>
>> You MUST have the following in your ar.cfg if you want unbroken request id
>> chains created in chronilogical order for all forms:
>> Next-ID-Commit: F
>> NextID-Block-Size: 1
>>
>> And it does work. I have tried it many times.
>>
>> If you are after something other than an unbroken chain of request ids,
>> please
>> explain.
>>
>>         Best Regards - Misi, RRR AB, http://www.rrr.se (ARSList MVP 2011)
>>
>> Products from RRR Scandinavia (Best R.O.I. Award at WWRUG10/11/12):
>> * RRR|License - Not enough Remedy licenses? Save money by optimizing.
>> * RRR|Log - Performance issues or elusive bugs? Analyze your Remedy logs.
>> Find these products, and many free tools and utilities, at http://rrr.se.
>>
>> > Hi All,
>> >
>> > I tried many options whatever suggested so far. like given
>> "*Next-ID-Commit:
>> > T , **NextID-Block-Size: 100*" and even tried "*Next-ID-Commit: F ,
>> > **NextID-Block-Size:
>> > 1*, also chagened the form property "*Next Request ID Block - 1*".
>> >
>> > Today i can see huge difference in the request ID, it giving difference
>> of
>> > 700 and 600.
>> >
>> > Please find the below details.
>> >
>> >   Case ID Difference  2928816 -791  2929607 -5  2929612 -20  2929632 -14
>> > 2929646 -71  2929717 -5  2929722 -8
>> >
>> >
>> > On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 7:07 AM, Misi Mladoniczky <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> You must use the below values, which was default on systems prior to
>> >> 7.6.04:
>> >> Next-ID-Commit: F
>> >> NextID-Block-Size: 1
>> >>
>> >> The new default is T and 25.
>> >>
>> >> You can still do the block-size of 25 to minimize bottlenecks in your
>> >> system,
>> >> and instead set the block-size to 1 on those forms that is important to
>> >> keep
>> >> in sequence. Yes, it is a form-property :-)
>> >>
>> >>         Best Regards - Misi, RRR AB, http://www.rrr.se (ARSList MVP
>> 2011)
>> >>
>> >> Products from RRR Scandinavia (Best R.O.I. Award at WWRUG10/11/12):
>> >> * RRR|License - Not enough Remedy licenses? Save money by optimizing.
>> >> * RRR|Log - Performance issues or elusive bugs? Analyze your Remedy
>> logs.
>> >> Find these products, and many free tools and utilities, at
>> http://rrr.se.
>> >>
>> >> > Hi Snehal,
>> >> >
>> >> > Thanks for the mail.
>> >> >
>> >> > I have one doubt, it works fine in Dev remedy server with the
>> parameter
>> >> > detail.
>> >> > Please correct me if i am wrong.
>> >> >
>> >> > *Next-ID-Commit: F*
>> >> >
>> >> > *NextID-Block-Size: 1*
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 3:20 PM, snehal mhaske
>> >> > <[email protected]>wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> **
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Hi Karthick,**
>> >> >>
>> >> >> ** **
>> >> >>
>> >> >> *Next-ID-Commit* : When the system generates the next ID number for a
>> >> >> record in the****
>> >> >>
>> >> >> database, it performs a new commit transaction if this parameter is
>> set
>> >> to
>> >> >> T****
>> >> >>
>> >> >> (true). If the parameter is set to F (false), the transaction to
>> >> generate
>> >> >> the next****
>> >> >>
>> >> >> ID is included as part of the create entry transaction. *Set the
>> value
>> >> to
>> >> >> **T **to*
>> >> >>
>> >> >> *increase efficiency and for debugging*. The default is F.****
>> >> >>
>> >> >> ** **
>> >> >>
>> >> >> *NextID-Block-Size* : Allocates next IDs in blocks rather than one
>> at a
>> >> >> time. Allocating in blocks****
>> >> >>
>> >> >> increases performance during a create operation.****
>> >> >>
>> >> >> *Edit the **NextID-Block-Size **value to a positive number (up to
>> 1000),
>> >> >> for*
>> >> >>
>> >> >> *example: **NextID-Block-Size: 50***
>> >> >>
>> >> >> The default value is 1. If 0 or a negative number (for example, -1)
>> is
>> >> >> used,****
>> >> >>
>> >> >> the server will use the default value of 1.****
>> >> >>
>> >> >> You do not need to restart the server for the change to take effect.
>> >> The**
>> >> >> **
>> >> >>
>> >> >> option is started immediately.****
>> >> >>
>> >> >> To disable this option, set the value of NextID-Block-Size to 1, or
>> >> remove
>> >> >> ****
>> >> >>
>> >> >> the parameter from the configuration file. Note that this option does
>> >> not*
>> >> >> ***
>> >> >>
>> >> >> work with Informix databases.****
>> >> >>
>> >> >> ** **
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I would suggest, to add both the parameters in ar.cfg on Prod box.
>> Set
>> >> the
>> >> >> values as follows:****
>> >> >>
>> >> >> *Next-ID-Commit: T*
>> >> >>
>> >> >> *NextID-Block-Size: 100*
>> >> >>
>> >> >> ** **
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Regards,****
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Snehal****
>> >> >>
>> >> >> *From:* Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:
>> >> >> [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Karthick S
>> >> >> *Sent:* Tuesday, August 20, 2013 9:42 AM
>> >> >> *To:* [email protected]
>> >> >> *Subject:* Sequence issue in Request ID while creating tickets****
>> >> >>
>> >> >> ** **
>> >> >>
>> >> >> ** ****
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Hi All,****
>> >> >>
>> >> >> ** **
>> >> >>
>> >> >> We have Sequence issue in Request ID while creating tickets in prod
>> >> Remedy
>> >> >> . Here are the few example numbers seem to be jumping and skipping
>> the
>> >> next
>> >> >> in sequence.****
>> >> >>
>> >> >> ** **
>> >> >>
>> >> >> 000000002930522****
>> >> >>
>> >> >> 000000002930521****
>> >> >>
>> >> >> 000000002930518****
>> >> >>
>> >> >> 000000002930515****
>> >> >>
>> >> >> ** **
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I have replicated the issue in Dev box and it seems to be working
>> fine
>> >> >> with sequence order. I have noticed the ar.cfg file and it has
>> >> >> Next-ID-Commit: F and Next Request ID Block Size 1. i couldn't find
>> the
>> >> >> same in Production ar.cfg file.****
>> >> >>
>> >> >> ** **
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I tried adding those details, but still nothing happens. do i really
>> >> need
>> >> >> to restart the services.****
>> >> >>
>> >> >> ** **
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Please provide your idea on this.****
>> >> >>
>> >> >> ** **
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Remedy Version is 7.1 Patch 006****
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Windows 2003****
>> >> >>
>> >> >> SQL 2005 DB****
>> >> >>
>> >> >>  ****
>> >> >>
>> >> >>  ****
>> >> >>
>> >> >> *Thanks and Regards,*****
>> >> >>
>> >> >> *Karthick S*****
>> >> >>
>> >> >> _ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" and have been for 20 years_ ****
>> >> >>  _ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" and have been for 20 years_
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > --
>> >> > **
>> >> > **
>> >> > *Thanks and Regards,*
>> >> > *Karthick S*
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> _______________________________________________________________________________
>> >> > UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
>> >> > "Where the Answers Are, and have been for 20 years"
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> _______________________________________________________________________________
>> >> UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
>> >> "Where the Answers Are, and have been for 20 years"
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > **
>> > **
>> > *Thanks and Regards,*
>> > *Karthick S*
>> >
>> >
>> _______________________________________________________________________________
>> > UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
>> > "Where the Answers Are, and have been for 20 years"
>> >
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________________
>> UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
>> "Where the Answers Are, and have been for 20 years"
>>
>
>
>
> --
> **
> **
> *Thanks and Regards,*
> *Karthick S*
>
> _______________________________________________________________________________
> UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
> "Where the Answers Are, and have been for 20 years"
>

_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
"Where the Answers Are, and have been for 20 years"

Reply via email to