I second that, I fail to see the harm in allowing any company that qualifies 
for a direct ipv6 be allocated a /40. There are many companies in the US that 
would never use up all 256 internal /48s, and there are some that would need 
more, or want to perhaps move the site mask to a /56, but with an automatic 
initial assignment of that size it would be easy to justify as a future proof 
allocation to the executive team. It also seems to me that entities larger than 
this are more likely to have multiple AS numbers and be using multiple routing 
slots anyway so multiple blocks might make more sense...

Best regards,

Bill Buhler

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf 
Of james machado
Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2015 3:47 PM
To: William Herrin
Cc: Gary T. Giesen; [email protected]
Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] IPv6 End-User Initial Assignment Policy (or: Please 
don't me make do ULA + NAT66)

So we argue for a /48 for each home user site but we toss out that argument 
when it comes to a smaller business with multiple sites?

I applaud the intent but think it is too short sighted William. It should take 
no more routing slots for an aggregated /40 or /44 than for a /48 and the /40 
or /44 are in line with the v6 paradigm that has been fronted on this list and 
others.

On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 1:28 PM, William Herrin <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 12:59 PM, William Herrin <[email protected]> wrote:
>> I think that for now any end user willing to pay ARIN's fee should 
>> qualify for a /48 regardless of any technical criteria.
>
> This got me thinking. Who would choke on a policy proposal which 
> looked like the following?
>
> Add to section 6.5.8.1:
>
> (f) All end user organizations who do not qualify for addresses under
> (a) through (e) qualify for a direct assignment of exactly one /48.
> This section (f) shall expire upon determination by ARIN staff that
> IPv6 has become the "dominant" network protocol on the public 
> Internet. The expiry shall not impact prior assignments made under 
> this section.
>
> Regards,
> Bill Herrin
>
> --
> William Herrin ................ [email protected]  [email protected] 
> Owner, Dirtside Systems ......... Web: <http://www.dirtside.com/> 
> _______________________________________________
> PPML
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN 
> Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
> Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
_______________________________________________
PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public 
Policy Mailing List ([email protected]).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
_______________________________________________
PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.

Reply via email to