We're not talking 50 new routes. We're talking about an aggregate /40. GTG
-----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of William Herrin Sent: February-17-15 1:06 PM To: Gary T. Giesen Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] IPv6 End-User Initial Assignment Policy (or: Please don't me make do ULA + NAT66) On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 12:54 PM, Gary T. Giesen <[email protected]> wrote: > I don't necessarily disagree. Just trying to minimize the business > risk of having to have virtually all of my customers qualify under e) > with the risk of rejection because my use case isn't specifically spelled out. Hi Gary, When your use case is within an inch or two the one we'd like to prevent, 50 new routes in the table, each serving 10 people on average, business risk kinda goes with the territory. Regards, Bill Herrin -- William Herrin ................ [email protected] [email protected] Owner, Dirtside Systems ......... Web: <http://www.dirtside.com/> _______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues. _______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
