On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 11:47 AM, Gary T. Giesen <[email protected]> wrote: > Am I to assume then that you disagree with the provisions in NRPM 6.5.8.1 c. > and d. then?
Hi Gary, Actually, I think that for now any end user willing to pay ARIN's fee should qualify for a /48 regardless of any technical criteria. The v4 swamp caused no lasting harm but the v6 deployment delay while we dance around justification has been nasty. On the other hand, I don't think such an approach should outlive the v4/v6 50/50 mark so it wouldn't resolve your long term business risk concerns. Long term I think 6.5.8.1 c and d are an artifact of our willingness to accept single homed entities in to the IPv4 table, something that made more sense two decades ago when Internet connections were sparsely available. Regards, Bill Herrin -- William Herrin ................ [email protected] [email protected] Owner, Dirtside Systems ......... Web: <http://www.dirtside.com/> _______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
