AF11x doesn't have an SFP.  That's about the only thing I can say about it.

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Jan 12, 2017 6:14 PM, "Jon Langeler" <[email protected]> wrote:

> What's the one way throughout of Mimosa vs AF11x vs IP20 in 40Mhz?
>
> Jon Langeler
> Michwave Technologies, Inc.
>
>
> On Jan 12, 2017, at 5:55 PM, Mike Hammett <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> At 40 MHz and a single polarity, you're looking at an almost insignificant
> increase in throughput.
>
> Their claim is 1.2 gb+.
> Cut that in half as they're advertising the aggregate, so 600 mb+.
> That's using both polarities, so now only 300 mb+.
> Only I haven't heard of anyone getting much more than 500 in a single
> direction (they may certainly exist, I just haven't seen them), so now that
> 300 is really only 250.
>
>
> Not much of an upgrade unless you can also get larger channels in both
> polarities.
>
>
>
> -----
> Mike Hammett
> Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/>
> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>
> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>
> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions>
> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
> Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/>
> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix>
> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange>
> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
> The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/>
> <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp>
>
>
> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg>
> ------------------------------
> *From: *"Josh Baird" <[email protected]>
> *To: *[email protected]
> *Sent: *Thursday, January 12, 2017 11:47:42 AM
> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Our UBNT AF11x experience
>
> This PTP800 is only capable of running at 40Mhz (ODU-A) so it can only do
> 228Mbps full-duplex.  The AF11x should be able to do much more than that,
> right?
>
> On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 12:05 PM, Gino Villarini <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> IIRC, PTP800 is Remec Style, you'll need Remec to N connector adapters
>> (AF11x is N)
>>
>> What do you expect to achieve with this upgrade?  Not much capacity
>>  difference between PTP800 and AF11x, maybe 50-80- mbps more.  Only if you
>> have a xpic license you can double your throughput with the af11x
>>
>> From: Af <[email protected]> on behalf of Josh Baird <
>> [email protected]>
>> Reply-To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
>> Date: Thursday, January 12, 2017 at 9:12 AM
>> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Our UBNT AF11x experience
>>
>> Good news - thanks for sharing.
>>
>> Somewhat un-related question:
>>
>> I have a PTP-800 link using these dishes:
>>
>> http://www.hol4g.com/AC/product.aspx?number=ANC-VHLP3-
>> 11W-RR1&p=237127&sc=0
>>
>> Do you know if I can re-use these dishes with the AF11x?  Do I need
>> adapters?
>>
>> Josh
>>
>>
>>
>> *Gino Villarini*
>> President
>> Metro Office Park #18 Suite 304 Guaynabo, Puerto Rico 00968
>>
>> <aeronet-logo_310cfc3e-6691-4f69-bd49-b37b834b9238.png>
>> On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 8:07 AM, Gino Villarini <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hey all, just dropping by to share our experience with AF11x, we habe
>>> been beta testing the unit since Sept and for the last 3 months, the unit
>>> has been rock solid.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> We are very happy with its performance, just wished it had a SFP port!
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> This unit replaced a Mimosa B11 unit that we were having some
>>> intermitent throughtput issues,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> The swap was easy since we reused the Jirous Dishes and only had to add
>>> the af11x adapters to it,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> The link  went live on 9/21/16 and on the first weeks we experienced
>>> some lockups, but after a revised beta fw was applied, all issues went
>>> away.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> For UBNT, please add SFP port and continue the good work towards a af6x
>>> and af18x
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *Gino Villarini*
>>> President
>>> Metro Office Park #18 Suite 304 Guaynabo, Puerto Rico 00968
>>>
>>> <aeronet-logo_310cfc3e-6691-4f69-bd49-b37b834b9238.png>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>

Reply via email to