Yes, it is important to us. Rule of thumb I hate Axis, but I'll take a look.
I really like what I'm seeing with Suprema though, especially the API, etc. On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 9:10 PM, Jon Auer <[email protected]> wrote: > Axis A1001 is ~$500 and PoE powered. Each unit will handle 2 doors BUT > additional A1001s link up so there's unified config/provisioning/management. > By PoE powered I mean the controller runs off PoE, powers the strike, and > the reader. No separate power system needed. > The Web UI is fast, unlike the lag on HID EdgeSolo. > > The cool thing is that, in addition to traditional Weigand, these work with > the new reader standard so the reader-controller link is encrypted and you > can do mutual authentication with RF smartcards (should you care about > that). > > We're using these after getting annoyed with HID VertX (and associated > Windows-based controller) and HID EdgeSolo (not sufficiently flexible). > > On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 5:52 PM, Josh Reynolds <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> I'm dying here. Every single system I can find is shit or costs an arm >> and a leg, to the point where I'm considering starting a company to >> make a better system. I just need an embedded, web based, IP access >> control system. It needs to be able to control the individual door >> access controllers to electronic striker or maglock to the keypad. POE >> here is best. If it requires software running on a windows PC then I >> don't want anything to do with it, even for those of you who are like >> "put it in a vm"... no. Those resources are reserved for properly >> functioning operation systems (and LXC containers!). >> >> I've got 3 doors at one location, then 2 more doors at 2 other locations. >> >> If it has a mobile app, that's even better. >> >> I've installed a couple of HID Global and DoorKing systems in the past >> and nothing about this is hard, but the chinese systems are only made >> for a single location. >> >> Any suggestions? > >
