I like that they look like the Jupiter 2 on the 19dB version Jaime Solorza Wireless Systems Architect 915-861-1390
On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 10:01 AM, Jaime Solorza <[email protected]> wrote: > are they as "leaky" RF wise as Rockets? > > Jaime Solorza > Wireless Systems Architect > 915-861-1390 > > On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 9:55 AM, Josh Luthman <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> With no noise, Nanobeams are just a dream. I have a link 11.2 miles with >> 95% airmax that are working beautifully. >> >> In another location the link is totally crap, even with a -60. The noise >> on the far tower just won't let it function. Note that ePMP worked very >> well as a replacement. >> >> >> Josh Luthman >> Office: 937-552-2340 >> Direct: 937-552-2343 >> 1100 Wayne St >> Suite 1337 >> Troy, OH 45373 >> >> On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 11:33 AM, Jaime Solorza <[email protected] >> > wrote: >> >>> Going to install our first NanoBeam to NanoBeam link on Friday at seven >>> miles....lets see how well they work. on bench they did great. >>> >>> Jaime Solorza >>> Wireless Systems Architect >>> 915-861-1390 >>> >>> On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 11:33 PM, Rory Conaway <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> I know that was some discussion on this and some people said that >>>> mixing firmware was a problem, even with 5.5.10. I hadn’t seen the problem >>>> until about a week ago. Had PowerBridge talking to a Powerbeam talking to >>>> a PowerBridge which then link to a another PTP using NS5’s and an AP on >>>> that end. It seemed to work great for several months. A week ago, the AP >>>> at the end started pushing through 10-20 pings and then dropping 3 pings. >>>> After finding nothing, we pull the PowerBridge and replaced it with a >>>> PowerBeam. Problem solved. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On the other hand, we have a boatload of NS5M’s, some with XW firmware >>>> connected to XM Rockets. No problems so far. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Rory >>>> >>> >>> >> >
