are they as "leaky" RF wise as Rockets? Jaime Solorza Wireless Systems Architect 915-861-1390
On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 9:55 AM, Josh Luthman <[email protected]> wrote: > With no noise, Nanobeams are just a dream. I have a link 11.2 miles with > 95% airmax that are working beautifully. > > In another location the link is totally crap, even with a -60. The noise > on the far tower just won't let it function. Note that ePMP worked very > well as a replacement. > > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > > On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 11:33 AM, Jaime Solorza <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Going to install our first NanoBeam to NanoBeam link on Friday at seven >> miles....lets see how well they work. on bench they did great. >> >> Jaime Solorza >> Wireless Systems Architect >> 915-861-1390 >> >> On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 11:33 PM, Rory Conaway <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> I know that was some discussion on this and some people said that >>> mixing firmware was a problem, even with 5.5.10. I hadn’t seen the problem >>> until about a week ago. Had PowerBridge talking to a Powerbeam talking to >>> a PowerBridge which then link to a another PTP using NS5’s and an AP on >>> that end. It seemed to work great for several months. A week ago, the AP >>> at the end started pushing through 10-20 pings and then dropping 3 pings. >>> After finding nothing, we pull the PowerBridge and replaced it with a >>> PowerBeam. Problem solved. >>> >>> >>> >>> On the other hand, we have a boatload of NS5M’s, some with XW firmware >>> connected to XM Rockets. No problems so far. >>> >>> >>> >>> Rory >>> >> >> >
