Also I think it smells like using socket from multiple threads...
On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 3:28 PM, Doron Somech <[email protected]> wrote: > It don't think it is correct, there might be an issue we need to solve. > > The workaround is not to use multi-part messages... > > On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 10:11 AM, zmqdev <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Ranjeet Kumar described his troubles with the assertion in >> >> >> http://lists.zeromq.org/pipermail/zeromq-dev/2016-September/030839.html >> >> According to >> >> >> http://lists.zeromq.org/pipermail/zeromq-dev/2016-September/030851.html >> >> he apparently solved his problem by commenting the assertion out. >> >> 1. Could someone who understands that part of the code advise on the safety >> of removing that assertion? >> >> 2. Is the assertion even correct? >> >> Thanks >> >> _______________________________________________ >> zeromq-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
