It don't think it is correct, there might be an issue we need to solve. The workaround is not to use multi-part messages...
On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 10:11 AM, zmqdev <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > Ranjeet Kumar described his troubles with the assertion in > > > http://lists.zeromq.org/pipermail/zeromq-dev/2016-September/030839.html > > According to > > > http://lists.zeromq.org/pipermail/zeromq-dev/2016-September/030851.html > > he apparently solved his problem by commenting the assertion out. > > 1. Could someone who understands that part of the code advise on the safety > of removing that assertion? > > 2. Is the assertion even correct? > > Thanks > > _______________________________________________ > zeromq-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
