You can make a pull request. Anyway majordomo is reference protocol, you can just copy it, change the name and re-publish for you users. On Jun 13, 2016 21:37, "Dariusz Suchojad" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hello, > > I have just noticed that MDP 0.1 has been deprecated and I would like to > ask for this tag to be removed. > > http://rfc.zeromq.org/spec:7/ > > Truth be told, it is possible that it has been the case for some time > though on the other hand, I could swear I did not see it a couple of > weeks ago. > > The reason I'm asking for it is that there is nothing wrong with this > protocol - it is straightforward, works very well and pretty much the > only thing that I would change is adding responses to READY commands > instead of having workers assume that it succeeds unless a subsequent > command fails. > > (I would also expose IP addresses of remote sockets in the public API > but that's another kettle of fish). > > We are currently adding 0.1 to Zato: > > https://zato.io/docs/ > > It's a Python-based SOA/API integration platform - we already have > support for ZeroMQ and in this context MDP will give our users nice > synchronous connectivity when HTTP adds too much overhead and raw TCP > sockets are not particularly palatable. > > I understand that there is MDP 0.2 which we are going to add too: > > http://rfc.zeromq.org/spec:18 > > But since 0.2 is backward-incompatible with 0.1, even though the changes > are small, the two protocols cannot be mixed up anyway thus it looks > there is no reason to deprecate 0.1, they are just different things. > > And there is 0.3 planned .. > > https://github.com/zeromq/majordomo/issues/34 > > .. which appears to be a specification unlike either of the previous MDP > versions. > > One this ticket is closed I'm not entirely sure what will happen? Will > 0.2 become deprecated then? But since 0.3 is a different protocol then > perhaps it should not be called MDP at this point? > > I just don't want to give our users impression that we are supporting > deprecated protocols only because I do know that they are just fine, > both 0.1 and 0.2, even if they are not compatible. > > At the same time I would like to foster their adoption - they are quite > convenient and definitely make sense, please do not deprecate them. > > best regards, > > -- > Dariusz Suchojad > > https://zato.io > ESB, SOA, REST, APIs and Cloud Integrations in Python > > _______________________________________________ > zeromq-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
_______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
