Michel Dänzer <[email protected]> writes: > FWIW, the latter is no reason to remove DRI1 support as a whole AFAICT: > SIGIO was only used for DRI1 kernel driven context switching,
It looks like the only non-SIGIO path would be for drivers using DRI_KERNEL_SWAP; DRI_HIDE_X_CONTEXT and DRI_SERVER_SWAP both require SIGIO. > So, it's fairly safe to say that removing SIGIO support would have no > practical impact on the rest of the DRI1 code. I've also split my patch series up so that you can leave the DRI1 SIGIO code while removing all of the input-related SIGIO code. -- -keith
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
