On 08/12/15 06:36 PM, Emil Velikov wrote: > On 8 December 2015 at 22:58, Connor Behan <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 08/12/15 05:41 PM, Adam Jackson wrote: >>> DRI1 hasn't really been a supported option for a while now, Mesa hasn't >>> supplied any drivers for it in years, and the design really isn't >>> compatible with KMS-like drivers. Also, Keith has some upcoming work to >>> thread input handling that will conflict with the SIGIO handling, so if >>> it's not already broken it's soon to get worse. >>> >>> - ajax >>> >>> >>> >> Far from broken. DRI1 has been one of the more stable interfaces for the >> last few years. And if that changes with Keith's work, it's not exactly >> going to take months for me to notice something is wrong and run a >> bisect. Freezing Xorg at 1.18 gives up much more than freezing Mesa at 7.11. >> > Funny enough I mentioned you (on IRC) just as the patches were > reaching the ML. Did you have much progress on the KMS + r128 front ? > I take it that you're looking at the radeon kernel module (as opposed > to the r128 one) as mentioned by Alex ? > > I'm afraid I don't have any such hardware to chip-in, although I'd > love to see people giving this (and other dri1 drivers) some much > needed love. > > -Emil Unfortunately, I kept putting it off because I didn't think a deadline would be coming up so quickly.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
