On Fri, 2011-09-30 at 08:55 +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote: > Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer <[email protected]> > for the patch but I wonder if this is really useful. With modular > releases > the katamari version doesn't mean that much anymore. I'd say you could > just > leave the X Version 11 in and skip the katamari version. > >
Noted. Most of the docs in xorg had hard coded numbers such as 6.4, 6.8,
you name it.
They were probably all wrong or impossible to verify.
Anyone reading this has any suggestion as to what would be useful on the
title page?
At our disposal we have:
<!ENTITY majorvers "7">
<!ENTITY reldate "December 2010">
And we also have all the common autoconf variables such as tarname (e.g.
libX11)
and so on.
Thanks for the review. This completes the patch series.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
