On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 11:00 PM, Mark Kettenis <[email protected]> wrote: >> From: =?UTF-8?q?Erkki=20Sepp=C3=A4l=C3=A4?= <[email protected]> >> Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 09:53:44 +0200 >> >> Reordered code to first to do the comparison and then to release data > > Your static analysis tool isn't all that good. Using the value of a > pointer after freeing the storage it points to is totally fine.
While you're right, this is a bit strange. Other patches doing this have already been accepted, so I don't see any problem. Matt _______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
