On Thu, 2010-11-11 at 18:57 -0600, Pat Kane wrote:

> You guys have added some really nice features to build.sh, like "-L",
> thank you.
> I would not mind if you required that it be a bash script, just that
> the 1st line says
> it is a /bin/sh script.
> 
> If anyone really thinks that this build.sh script needs to be
> compatible with a very
> old /bin/sh I will create a patch to fix the problems.
> 
> My vote is to keep it a /bin/bash script and  wave goodbye to the 20th
> century,
> shall I make a patch for that?


It's basically for users like yourself to decide. The script will only
live if people are using it and maintaining it.

I think the "local" was a recent addition, I don't recall the script not
working on any specific platform.
That can be fixed easily.

I recall objections for this script to being a bash script only on this
list not too long ago. I think it was because
bash is not always installed, not sure. I'd rather see the script be
fixed to work for the largest number of users.

BTW, I pushed your patch a couple of days ago, thanks.

Gaetan

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________
[email protected]: X.Org development
Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel
Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel

Reply via email to