You guys have added some really nice features to build.sh, like "-L", thank you. I would not mind if you required that it be a bash script, just that the 1st line says it is a /bin/sh script.
If anyone really thinks that this build.sh script needs to be compatible with a very old /bin/sh I will create a patch to fix the problems. My vote is to keep it a /bin/bash script and wave goodbye to the 20th century, shall I make a patch for that? Your 21st Century Pal, Pat --- On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 6:21 PM, Gaetan Nadon <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, 2010-11-11 at 23:40 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > > Thomas Dickey <[email protected]> (11/11/2010): >> That's probably the bash manpage, since you're quoting from it. > > No, that's dash's. dash has some extra features on top of POSIX as far > as I can tell. See [1], no “local” (except for “locale” ;)) stuff > documented there. > > I have both "bash" and "dash" (first time I hear about it!) installed. > > man sh title: BSD General Commands Manual "command interpreter (shell)" > man bash title: GNU Bourne-Again SHell > > I'll gladly push a patch :-) > _______________________________________________ > [email protected]: X.Org development > Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel > Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel > _______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
