On Sep 14, 2010, at 14:06, Thomas Dickey wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Sep 2010, Julien Cristau wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 09:50:44 -0400, Gaetan Nadon wrote:
>> [] in configure is a PITA because [] are special in m4. That doesn't
>> apply to this script.
>
> Actually, autoconf changes the quotes _to_ [] from the more-pervasive `'.
>
> ("test" is used for portability, though this list doesn't touch much on that).
I belive we are concerned about portability. Do you have an example of a
bourne-derived shell (we're talking about sh after all) that doesn't have
support for [] on a system that doesn't have an [ executable in $PATH?
_______________________________________________
[email protected]: X.Org development
Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel
Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
