On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 00:00:39 +0300, Tiago Vignatti <[email protected]> wrote:
> But if we go for it, we're going have an implementation that "exceeds" > the protocol. Is that valid? Sure, there's nothing saying that we have to be able to not provide certain extensions in the sample implementation; the core X protocol just isn't useable by the bulk of X applications these days without some of the 'standard' extensions. -- [email protected]
pgprWGIvdxXNr.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
