On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 9:01 AM, Keith Packard <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, 08 Apr 2010 02:33:22 -0500, "Yaakov (Cygwin/X)" > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> 6) Please tell me you're not planning on releasing this package with the >> name "proto". :-) > > Oh. Yeah, probably not the best name. 'xproto'? 'xprotocol'?
Well, considering we already have 'xproto' as one of the individual modules, it might make sense to go with 'xorg-proto'. That would be nicely synced with 'xorg-server'. -- Dan _______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
