On Wed, 2010-03-17 at 14:14 +0000, Matej Urbas wrote: > Hi, > > I hope you don't mind me asking something like this here, but is there a > coding guideline for referencing bugs in related projects for which we > have to do a 'temporary' workaround in our project? > > Here is a description of what I mean -- using a (hypothetical) example: > > int a = getSomeNumber(); > // WA: We have to do something crazy because of a bug in some other > // project: > // [WABUG:https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527510] > while (a < 10) { > a = getSomeOtherNumber(); > } > > Thus, the format of the so-called 'Workaround Bug' would be: > > [WABUG:<uri>] > > Checking for fixed/referenced WABUGs could be automated easily and > everyone would be happy. > > Do we have anything like that? >
Not to my knowledge. I checked the GNU coding standards but could not find anything. > Thank you, > --- > Matej > _______________________________________________ > [email protected]: X.Org development > Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel > Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
