On Tue, 2009-08-25 at 23:25 +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote: > I raised them a long time ago... What's happened with DRI2 is that most > of the GLX synchronization functionality available with DRI1 has been > ignored, and instead there's an implicit ad-hoc implementation detail.
I'm assuming we'll have OML_sync_control capable DRI2 in the near term. > Which would naturally be CopyArea (just like the DRI2 implementations > you keep bringing up), not a RENDER operation. Composite is the Render equivalent of CopyArea. -- [email protected]
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ xorg-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
