On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 16:31 +0200, Matthias Hopf wrote: > Also I noted that the intel driver current uses BACKLIGHT as the > property name - I thought we all agreed that we wouldn't use any > ALL_CAPS names any more. Is this a left-over, or just an oversight?
It's unchanged from the initial implementation. > And how to deal with this? Renaming this to Backlight in the driver > probably won't do any good, as some tools are already using the > BACKLIGHT one. Shall the implementation provide both cases for a while? > > Also xbacklight should probably be changed to use Backlight if possible. Yup, these both sound sensible. Sorry for using ALL_CAPS :-) -- [email protected]
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ xorg-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
