On Tue, 18 Aug 2009 16:31:59 +0200 Matthias Hopf <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Aug 18, 09 13:46:59 +0200, Matthias Hopf wrote: > > I'd like to document the Backlight property as a known good > > property. Comments? > > Also I noted that the intel driver current uses BACKLIGHT as the > property name - I thought we all agreed that we wouldn't use any > ALL_CAPS names any more. Is this a left-over, or just an oversight? Leftover I think, from before you standardized the xrandr props... > And how to deal with this? Renaming this to Backlight in the driver > probably won't do any good, as some tools are already using the > BACKLIGHT one. Shall the implementation provide both cases for a > while? > > Also xbacklight should probably be changed to use Backlight if > possible. Yeah, we can make x-v-i take both. -- Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ xorg-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
