On 06.11.2019 10:19, Andrii Anisov wrote: > From: Artem Mygaiev <[email protected]> > > Still have linker issues
This may be acceptable for an RFC series, but doesn't justify there not being any other description. Just to give an example,I'd like to understand why ... > --- a/Config.mk > +++ b/Config.mk > @@ -221,7 +221,9 @@ CFLAGS += -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes > > $(call cc-option-add,HOSTCFLAGS,HOSTCC,-Wdeclaration-after-statement) > $(call cc-option-add,CFLAGS,CC,-Wdeclaration-after-statement) > +ifneq ($(armds),y) > $(call cc-option-add,CFLAGS,CC,-Wno-unused-but-set-variable) > +endif > $(call cc-option-add,CFLAGS,CC,-Wno-unused-local-typedefs) > > LDFLAGS += $(foreach i, $(EXTRA_LIB), -L$(i)) ... this would be necessary. Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
