On 04.03.2026 19:21, Bernhard Kaindl wrote: > Jan Beulich <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 26.02.2026 15:29, Bernhard Kaindl wrote: >>> This only needs moving the ASSERT to before the subtraction. >>> See the previous commit moving the BUG_ON for outstanding_claims. >> >> Please can you avoid such statements? You won't know in which order the >> patches are committed: Patch 01 may go in weeks or months before patch >> 02. > > Thanks, ok, will remove. > > - NB. I do think the first 3 commits should best be applied in one go.
Such would want stating in the cover letter and in all affected patches (outside of the commit message area of course). Preferably with a reason (it's not quite clear to me, I have to admit, but then I also haven't looked at patch 3 so far). Jan
