On 29.10.2025 14:38, Dmytro Prokopchuk1 wrote:
> These files 'docs/misc/kconfig{,-language}.txt' were deleted, but
> references are still present in Xen. Remove them to clean-up.
>
> Fixes: f80fe2b34f08 ("xen: Update Kconfig to Linux v5.4")
Hmm, that commit replaced the .txt files with .rst ones, so maybe you want a
2nd tag here referencing 044503f61c95 ("docs: Delete kconfig docs to fix
licensing violation")?
> --- a/INSTALL
> +++ b/INSTALL
> @@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ Xen Hypervisor
> ==============
>
> Xen itself is configured via a `kconfig' system borrowed from Linux.
> -See docs/misc/kconfig.txt.
> +See https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/kbuild/.
Is linking to "latest" doc really appropriate, when we don't even try to stay
up-to-date? That's what Andrew's commit suggests, but I dare to question this.
> --- a/xen/Kconfig
> +++ b/xen/Kconfig
> @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
> #
> # For a description of the syntax of this configuration file,
> -# see docs/misc/kconfig-language.txt
> +# see https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/kbuild/
Maybe more specifically
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/kbuild/kconfig-language.html
at least here (with latest possibly replaced as per above)?
Jan
