On 18.09.2025 14:16, Mykyta Poturai wrote: > --- a/config/arm64.mk > +++ b/config/arm64.mk > @@ -1,5 +1,6 @@ > CONFIG_ARM := y > CONFIG_ARM_64 := y > +CONFIG_HOTPLUG := y > > CONFIG_XEN_INSTALL_SUFFIX := > > --- a/config/x86_32.mk > +++ b/config/x86_32.mk > @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@ CONFIG_X86_32 := y > > CONFIG_MIGRATE := y > CONFIG_XCUTILS := y > +CONFIG_HOTPLUG := y > > CFLAGS += -m32 -march=i686 > > --- a/config/x86_64.mk > +++ b/config/x86_64.mk > @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@ CONFIG_X86_64 := y > > CONFIG_MIGRATE := y > CONFIG_XCUTILS := y > +CONFIG_HOTPLUG := y > > CONFIG_XEN_INSTALL_SUFFIX := .gz
I realize you only do what is already being done, but I question this way of doing things when the scope is tools-only. Any CONFIG_* put here cannot have an identically named, but potentially set differently Kconfig setting in xen/: Any use of such in a Makefile could end up being wrong, and would pretty surely end up being confusing. Jan
