> -----Original Message-----
> From: George Dunlap
> Sent: Thursday, July 5, 2018 12:55 AM
> To: Jan Beulich <[email protected]>
> Cc: Xin Li <[email protected]>; Andrew Cooper
> <[email protected]>; Ming Lu <[email protected]>; Sergey Dyasli
> <[email protected]>; Wei Liu <[email protected]>; Xin Li (Talons)
> <[email protected]>; George Dunlap <[email protected]>; Stefano
> Stabellini <[email protected]>; xen-devel <[email protected]>;
> Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <[email protected]>; Daniel de Graaf
> <[email protected]>; Tim (Xen.org) <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] xen/xsm: Introduce new boot parameter xsm
>
>
>
> > On Jul 3, 2018, at 8:12 AM, Jan Beulich <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > First of all - please indicate the version also in the subject, i.e.
> > here [PATCH v2 1/2] or some such.
> >
> >>>> On 03.07.18 at 03:26, <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> v2
> >> To further discuss:
> >> 1) is "dummy" a good command line option?
> >> other choices: basic", "trivial", or "simple"
> >
> > Indeed, but not limited to the named set.
>
> I think I’d go with “standard” or “default”. The “default” restrictions are
> by no
> means “dummy”, “trivial”, or “simple” — they’re carefully thought out for the
> most common Xen deployment.
"default" seems to be a good choice.
It matches the code logic.
if ( !strcmp(s, "default") )
xsm_bootparam = XSM_BOOTPARAM_DUMMY;
also update " docs/misc/xen-command-line.markdown"
>
> -George
Best regards
Xin(Talons) Li
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
