On 09.07.2024 04:47, Chen, Jiqian wrote:
> On 2024/7/8 22:56, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 08.07.2024 13:41, Jiqian Chen wrote:
>>> When a device has been reset on dom0 side, the Xen hypervisor
>>> doesn't get notification, so the cached state in vpci is all
>>> out of date compare with the real device state.
>>>
>>> To solve that problem, add a new hypercall to support the reset
>>> of pcidev and clear the vpci state of device. So that once the
>>> state of device is reset on dom0 side, dom0 can call this
>>> hypercall to notify hypervisor.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jiqian Chen <[email protected]>
>>> Signed-off-by: Huang Rui <[email protected]>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jiqian Chen <[email protected]>
>>> Reviewed-by: Stewart Hildebrand <[email protected]>
>>> Reviewed-by: Stefano Stabellini <[email protected]>
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich <[email protected]>
> Thank you very much!
> 
>>
>> Just to double check: You're sure the other two R-b are still applicable,
>> despite the various changes that have been made?
> Will remove in next version.
> 
>>
>> As a purely cosmetic remark: I think I would have preferred if the new
>> identifiers didn't have "state" as a part; I simply don't think this adds
>> much value, while at the same time making these pretty long.
> Do you mean: remove "state" identifier on all the new codes?

"part of identifiers", yes. As that's a personal view, I wouldn't insist
though, unless others shared my perspective.

Jan

Reply via email to