On 12/5/23 9:59 AM, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 24.11.2023 11:30, Oleksii Kurochko wrote: >> --- a/xen/include/public/hvm/save.h >> +++ b/xen/include/public/hvm/save.h >> @@ -91,6 +91,8 @@ DECLARE_HVM_SAVE_TYPE(END, 0, struct hvm_save_end); >> #include "../arch-arm/hvm/save.h" >> #elif defined(__powerpc64__) >> #include "../arch-ppc.h" >> +#elif defined(__riscv) >> +#include "../arch-riscv/hvm/save.h" >> #else >> #error "unsupported architecture" >> #endif > > The PPC part here looks bogus altogether. Shawn? >
I think my original intention here was to avoid creating yet another empty header while still having a place to put PPC-specific definitions that might be required. See as how the ARM file is entirely empty though, I doubt we'll be any different, so this could definitely be dropped. > Jan Thanks, Shawn
