On Tue, Mar 21, 2023 at 04:51:43PM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 21.03.2023 15:42, Roger Pau Monné wrote: > > On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 08:49:52AM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote: > >> Respective Core Gen10 processor lines are affected, too. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <[email protected]> > >> > >> --- a/xen/arch/x86/mm.c > >> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/mm.c > >> @@ -6045,6 +6045,8 @@ const struct platform_bad_page *__init g > >> case 0x000506e0: /* errata SKL167 / SKW159 */ > >> case 0x000806e0: /* erratum KBL??? */ > >> case 0x000906e0: /* errata KBL??? / KBW114 / CFW103 */ > >> + case 0x000a0650: /* erratum Core Gen10 U/H/S 101 */ > >> + case 0x000a0660: /* erratum Core Gen10 U/H/S 101 */ > > > > I think this is errata CML101, I would add that at the end of the > > comment. > > Indeed in the current version of the document CML prefix exist. The older > document I've been looking at has no such letter acronyms in front of the > errata numbers. I can certainly update. > > > Also you seem to be missing the '806ec' model (806e0 case)? (listed as > > 'U 4+2 V1') > > Isn't that pre-existing (see 2nd line of context above)?
Oh, indeed. Would you mind also adding a reference to CML101 for 0x000806e0 then? Thanks, Roger.
