On 24.06.2022 18:04, Anthony PERARD wrote:
> --- a/tools/fuzz/x86_instruction_emulator/Makefile
> +++ b/tools/fuzz/x86_instruction_emulator/Makefile
> @@ -8,33 +8,27 @@ else
> x86-insn-fuzz-all:
> endif
>
> -# Add libx86 to the build
> -vpath %.c $(XEN_ROOT)/xen/lib/x86
> +cpuid.c: %: $(XEN_ROOT)/xen/lib/x86/% FORCE
> + ln -nsf $< $@
I guess the idea with the original construct was to allow using further
source files from libx86 with as little code churn as possible. Your
change now requires two more lines to be touched. As long as we avoid
name collisions in the various directories (wrapper.c and a few more
files come from yet somewhere else), couldn't this rule simply be
%.c: $(XEN_ROOT)/xen/lib/x86/%.c FORCE
ln -nsf $< $@
?
> -x86_emulate:
> - [ -L $@ ] || ln -sf $(XEN_ROOT)/xen/arch/x86/$@
> +x86_emulate: FORCE
> + ln -nsf $(XEN_ROOT)/xen/arch/x86/$@
>
> x86_emulate/%: x86_emulate ;
>
> -x86-emulate.c x86-emulate.h wrappers.c: %:
> - [ -L $* ] || ln -sf $(XEN_ROOT)/tools/tests/x86_emulator/$*
> +x86-emulate.c x86-emulate.h wrappers.c: %:
> $(XEN_ROOT)/tools/tests/x86_emulator/% FORCE
> + ln -nsf $< $@
And similarly
%.c: $(XEN_ROOT)/tools/tests/x86_emulator/%.c FORCE
ln -nsf $< $@
%.h: $(XEN_ROOT)/tools/tests/x86_emulator/%.h FORCE
ln -nsf $< $@
here? (I'm hesitant to suggest plain %, i.e. without the filename
suffixes, as that would likely be at least confusing for Makefile.)
> @@ -67,3 +61,5 @@ afl: afl-harness
>
> .PHONY: afl-cov
> afl-cov: afl-harness-cov
> +
> +-include $(DEPS_INCLUDE)
I would expect doing so was avoided for some reason. Albeit it may
well be that too much cloning of tests/x86_emulator was done here,
and it's all fine this way. Can you confirm things to work when
building locally in just this subdir, e.g. via
make -sC .../tools/fuzz/x86_instruction_emulator
CC=/build/afl/2.52b-base/afl-gcc
?
Jan
