On Tue, Apr 19, 2022 at 01:04:18PM +0100, James Dingwall wrote:
> Thank you for your feedback.  I've updated the patch as suggested.  I've also
> incorporated two other changes, one is a simple style change for consistency,
> the other is to change a the test for a valid mtu from > 0 to >= 68.  I can
> resubmit the original patch if either of these are a problem.

The style change is fine, but I'd rather have the change to the
mtu check in a different patch.

Otherwise, the patch looks better, thanks.

-- 
Anthony PERARD

Reply via email to