"Dmitry Timoshkov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > "Paul Vriens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> This of course differs on every run. My point is that >> ERROR_NOT_ENOUGH_MEMORY is >> totally valid and should be catered for in the test otherwise we would still >> have failures for this test. > > I don't think it's a good idea to pollute every test that could fail > due to insufficient memory with fake error handling.
Obviously you don't want to do that for every test, but if you write a test that requires 1Gb of memory then you definitely need to check, you can't assume that this will always work. -- Alexandre Julliard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
