"Paul Vriens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> It's that last piece: "assuming there's enough memory left". >> >> That's a valid assumption I'd guess, and a lot of tests already rely >> on this: every thing which indirectly or directly allocates memory, >> creates windows, objects, processes, etc. >> > But the test doesn't cater for that. > > If I run the test with several heights on my win2k box the maximum I can have > is: > > CreateBitmap(0x7fff,0x2e63, ... > > before it fails with ERROR_NOT_ENOUGH_MEMORY. > > This of course differs on every run. My point is that ERROR_NOT_ENOUGH_MEMORY > is > totally valid and should be catered for in the test otherwise we would still > have failures for this test.
I don't think it's a good idea to pollute every test that could fail due to insufficient memory with fake error handling. -- Dmitry.
