hi,
2007/12/23, James Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Dec 22, 2007 6:57 PM, Maarten Lankhorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > James Hawkins schreef:
> >
> > > On Dec 22, 2007 12:25 PM, Huang, Zhangrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > >> 2007/12/23, James Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>> Disassembling what?
> > >>>
> > >> Native ole32.dll, MkParseDisplayName calls adsldp.dll's
> > >> DllGetClassObject twice,
> > >> frist using IID_IParseDisplayName, second using IID_IClassFactory.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > > Disassembling native Windows binaries is not allowed in this project,
> > > so I'm afraid none of your patches can be accepted
> > This is not the first time such disassemble occurs, I think it should be
> > made more clear that disassembly is not allowed in the wine project.
Thank you for mentioning that. But, I think that's kind of mixing up.
I didn't do anything like disassembly code to source code translation.
I just saw how native binaries work when debugging my app in Windows.
I didn't have much knowledge about COM, so I searched MSDN and found
some useful info about DllGetClassObject, then I wrote the patch, it's
quite clean.
Why I mentioning disassembly is just giving a sample that how to call
DllGetClassObject,
it doesn't mean I have done anything illegal to wine.
Anyway, have you tried my testcase? Then how can we fix the problem?
> >
> > After looking at the wine faq, I only see disassembling mentioned once
> > in "Who can't contribute to Wine?", not even in a full sentence. Perhaps
> > it should be made prominent in the documentation about 'sending patches'
> > and debugging parts, and also give it a seperate mentioning in the wiki?
> >
> > -Maarten
> >
>
> You could paste it all over winehq.org and the docs and it'll still happen.
That could be useful.
>
> --
> James Hawkins
>
--
$ apt-get moo
(__)
(oo)
/------\/
/ | ||
* /\---/\
~~ ~~
...."Have you mooed today?"...
