On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 2:05 PM, Ryosuke Niwa <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 1:39 PM, Dirk Pranke <[email protected]> wrote: >> Are you suggesting we should land a "failling" baseline in the meantime? > > > No. I'm suggesting patch authors perform their due diligence and either ask > port maintainers to rebaseline or rebaseline tests themselves. >
I think either you misunderstood my question, or I am misunderstanding your answer. I'm not asking "who", I'm asking "what" ... If we know some tests are failing, and when we fix a bug the tests will start passing again (but that patch might not land for quite some time), what should we (anyone) do in the meantime? Leave the tree red, land "incorrect" -expected baselines so that we can catch changes in behavior, or add lines to TestExpectations? Many of the lines you cited fell into the last category. -- Dirk _______________________________________________ webkit-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev
